![Picture](/uploads/1/0/4/2/10421402/7870972.jpg?250)
The farming trend has drastically revolutionised from the way fertilisers are used on farms/fields. The concern has now gripped on the application of organic fertilisers than traditional chemical fertilisers for growing different types of crops.
The prime reason for organic farms outperforming traditional and conventional farms is more revenue generation. Income plays an important part for all farmers and the farmers’ cooperatives. A study revealed that organic farms tend to generate thrice more profits than traditional farms. By using organic fertilisers such as AgriPower, the soil gets richer in quality producing more output with upgraded level of quality. Therefore, as a result, there are greater profits. However, the profits are also raised through cutting down on input costs of the fertilisers. In comparison with the traditional chemical fertilisers, the input costs were high due to the fact that chemicals were of higher prices, but since the introduction of organic fertilisers, input costs have reduced significantly. Summing up, less inputs and higher outputs are the functionality behind organic fertilisers.
In accordance with a study at The University of Minnesota suggested that farmers who cultivated crops using Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOS) earned significantly less money as compared to farmers who avoided the usage of GMO. Since traditional fertilisers make use of GMOs at a larger scale, hence they tend to earn lesser margins of profits than the organic fertilisers which is free from all sorts of GMOs.
In addition the aforementioned facts, a considerably fairer number of people utilised AgriPower organic fertilisers for growing various crops. As claimed by them, there was an increase of 40% yield after using these fertilisers. Therefore, AgriPower continues to deliver what it promises with higher rates of return.
The reduced labour and fertiliser costs not only minimise the overall cost of the process but also saves time. Lesser people are required in the fields which saves time. In traditional farming, relatively larger human capital was required to spray the chemicals on the fields over and again which wasted a lot of time. However, the organic fertilisers does not need a lot of time for application, as it is easy to use and saves time.
As in the case of growing tomatoes in the fields, traditionally the FELCRA SEBERANG PERAK in the northern state of Perak in Malaysia used traditional chemical fertilisers which were applied by the workers on a monthly basis. For growing extra crops and greater outputs, more labour were needed in the fields. However, after using AgriPower organic fertilisers there was no need of extra labour because of the fact that AgriPower was sprayed using a sprayer system. Hence, there was no drastic change in the number of people employed after using these fertilisers. This resulted in greater profits for them because in traditional fertilisers, they had to pay extra cash to the labour, accounting for greater input costs as well as more time needed to spray the chemical fertilisers.
Therefore, it is highly recommended to use organic fertilisers because they are time-savers and cost-efficient.
The prime reason for organic farms outperforming traditional and conventional farms is more revenue generation. Income plays an important part for all farmers and the farmers’ cooperatives. A study revealed that organic farms tend to generate thrice more profits than traditional farms. By using organic fertilisers such as AgriPower, the soil gets richer in quality producing more output with upgraded level of quality. Therefore, as a result, there are greater profits. However, the profits are also raised through cutting down on input costs of the fertilisers. In comparison with the traditional chemical fertilisers, the input costs were high due to the fact that chemicals were of higher prices, but since the introduction of organic fertilisers, input costs have reduced significantly. Summing up, less inputs and higher outputs are the functionality behind organic fertilisers.
In accordance with a study at The University of Minnesota suggested that farmers who cultivated crops using Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOS) earned significantly less money as compared to farmers who avoided the usage of GMO. Since traditional fertilisers make use of GMOs at a larger scale, hence they tend to earn lesser margins of profits than the organic fertilisers which is free from all sorts of GMOs.
In addition the aforementioned facts, a considerably fairer number of people utilised AgriPower organic fertilisers for growing various crops. As claimed by them, there was an increase of 40% yield after using these fertilisers. Therefore, AgriPower continues to deliver what it promises with higher rates of return.
The reduced labour and fertiliser costs not only minimise the overall cost of the process but also saves time. Lesser people are required in the fields which saves time. In traditional farming, relatively larger human capital was required to spray the chemicals on the fields over and again which wasted a lot of time. However, the organic fertilisers does not need a lot of time for application, as it is easy to use and saves time.
As in the case of growing tomatoes in the fields, traditionally the FELCRA SEBERANG PERAK in the northern state of Perak in Malaysia used traditional chemical fertilisers which were applied by the workers on a monthly basis. For growing extra crops and greater outputs, more labour were needed in the fields. However, after using AgriPower organic fertilisers there was no need of extra labour because of the fact that AgriPower was sprayed using a sprayer system. Hence, there was no drastic change in the number of people employed after using these fertilisers. This resulted in greater profits for them because in traditional fertilisers, they had to pay extra cash to the labour, accounting for greater input costs as well as more time needed to spray the chemical fertilisers.
Therefore, it is highly recommended to use organic fertilisers because they are time-savers and cost-efficient.